It is just what I was looking for, and will buy more. Part of the confusion when it comes to reading the Bible is that the Bible wasn’t originally written in English. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. The way it translates the text often packs a punch, in an understated English way. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. New Revised Standard Version – Pros and Cons Overall, the New Revised Standard Version is a good English Bible translation. Jul 05, 2014 Jonathan Huggins rated it really liked it. The Revised English Bible Item Preview remove-circle ... "A revision of the New English Bible"--Title page verso ... plus-circle Add Review. Reviewed in the United States on July 26, 2000 The Revised English Bible (REB) is a revision of the New English Bible (NEB), which was a completely new translation from the original languages. It makes an excellent Bible for use in church. You have us for a model; imitate those whose way of life conforms to it. In reading Psalms 65-68, I found these words: ‘girded’, ‘furrows’, ‘ridges’, ‘wreathed’, ‘whole offerings’, ‘plenteous’, ‘pinions’, ‘myriads’, ‘processions’, ‘minstrels’, ‘reeds’, ‘prostrate’. Gospel Acclamation 1 Cor 5:7-8. I am liking what I read and this translation is making me think. Avoiding technical, over-literary, and traditionally “religious” forms of expression, it renders the Bible accessible to everyone. The changes remove many of the most idiosyncratic renderings of the New English Bible, moving the REB more in the direction of standard translations such as NRSV or NIV. The Revised English Bible or REB, an odd thing here in the States. I dislike the translation “sea monsters.” It makes Genesis 1 read like a myth. I like this Bible’s minimalism. However, the modest goals of the committee grew more extensive overtime. The Revised English Bible (REB) is a revision of the New English Bible (NEB), which was a completely new translation from the original languages. A Bible professor told me that this translation was viewed as a sort of "high falutin" form of English, intended for a more educated English class of people. The REB is the result of both advances in scholarship and translation made since the 1960s and also a desire to correct what have been seen as some of the NEB's more egregious errors. I recommend the REB highly. I like it so much that I’ve decided to make the REB my go-to reading Bible for now (note: I prefer Bibles translations such as the REB that sit in the middle of the spectrum between literal translations of the originals and idiomatic renderings). Start your review of Revised English Bible. However, I have chosen to use the REB as my main reading Bible because I generally find it to be a very graceful and readable translation. 6 Favorites . A Critique of the Revised Standard Version Editor's note: This symposium is a brief expression of criticism of the Revised Standard Version edited by Dr. C. F. Lincoln and prepared by several members of the Faculty of Dallas Theological Seminary, with the advice and counsel of the … I have never seen a translation use semicolons so much! : no references, annotations, indexing, or maps; only a preface and introduction. The font is 9 pt Swift, with 8 pt translator notes. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2020. It was highly successful. This revision is based on the 1901 American Standard Version, and attempts to provide an accessible and literal English translation. However, I wish the REB’s paragraphs were broken up a bit more for readability. The Revised English Bible (REB) is a 1989 English-language translation of the Bible that updates the New English Bible (NEB) of 1970. In this video I unbox the Cambridge Revised English Bible in Black Faux Leather.Once I have had time to use this Bible I will do a full review. King James Version, “whales”). English Standard Version. This is a rating and review of the translation and not of the Bible itself. I was very happy with the presentation of this Bible. Though there is a subtle shadow of the text from the page below, it is not distracting while reading. Let us keep the festival, then, with none of the old leaven of evil and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. Low Production Quality Mars a Beautiful Translation, Reviewed in the United States on December 27, 2015. The Revised English Bible is a 1989 English-language translation of the Bible that updates the New English Bible of 1970. As I have often told you, and now tell you with tears, there are many whose way of life makes them enemies of the cross of Christ. As with its predecessor, it is published by the publishing houses of both the universities of Oxford and Cambridge.It is not to be confused with the Revised English Bible of 1877, which was an annotated and slightly corrected version of the King James Bible. By touching a word on a smartphone or tablet screen, I get an instant definition rather than having to thumb through a dictionary. Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2013, One gets so enwrapt in the chapter one is reading that all attention gets focussed, Reviewed in the United States on March 28, 2017. This is a reprint from 2010, presumably to match the Apocrypha edition, originally from 1996. 23Look!, the virgin will be with child, and will give birth to a son, and they will call his name Immanuel, c (which translated, means, “God with us”). The Revised English Bible (REB) translation is the result of collaboration between biblical scholars in the mainline Protestant Christian churches in the United Kingdom and Ireland to revise the New English Bible. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Published at the beginning of the 21st century, it is extremely close to the Revised Standard Version and is well suited to public reading and memorisation. The NRSV HarperCollins Study Bible, Revised and Updated Hardcover with Apocryphal and Deuterocanonical Books HarperOne / 2006 / Hardcover $27.99 Retail: $44.99 Save 38% ($17.00) ( Log Out /  The Revised Standard Version is the English translation of the Christian biblical canon, composed of the Old and New Testaments. We, by contrast, are citizens of heaven, and from heaven we expect our deliverer to come, the Lord Jesus Christ. We call it the REV because we are presenting a revised version of earlier English versions, primarily the American Standard Version of 1901 (ASV), which we have used as the base text for our work, updating it when we feel it is appropriate. The New Revised Standard Version of the Bible (NRSV) was published in 1989 and has received the widest acclaim and broadest support from academics and church leaders of any modern English translation.. The sentence structure of the REB can also be complex. Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2015. 11:3), the REB says “he will not judge by outward appearances or decide a case on hearsay.” The REB accurately conveys in modern English the meaning of the words that the NRSV translates more literally. 24 Then Joseph, awaking from sleep, did as the angel of … I was very happy with the presentation of this Bible, Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2015. I recommend searching for an earlier, leather bound printing of the Cambridge REB on the used market. The REB employs a modest amount of inclusive language and is good for public reading. A close look at this beautiful little NT from Cambridge to mark the 30th anniversary of the publication of the REB. As you can see below, the text setting for this edition of the REB is a more traditional two-column one: poetry is printed as poetry and prose is broken up into paragraphs. The translation is intended to be somewhat gender-inclusive, though not to the same extent as translations … 229 Previews . Read and analyzed the New Testament portion of this translation as part of a History of the Christian Tradition class at university, and have since done the same with various parts of the Old Testament (especially Leviticus). I personally wish the REB translators had followed their aim of using “natural” English vocabulary and sentence constructions more consistently. Write a review. Though there is a subtle shadow of the text from the page below, it is not distracting while reading. The faux leather shows creases and wear within the first few openings. He will transfigure our humble bodies, and give them a form like that of his own glorious body, by that power which enables him to make all things subject to himself. The RE530T REB Text edition is, like all Cambridge books, a high quality print, and this is one of its older editions. In this beta-testing process, all working drafts of the New English Translation were posted on www.bible.org for public review and comment. This is an extensive revision of the British New English Bible (1970) that eliminated many of the NEB's incautious renderings in favor of a more literal approach, but it remains considerably less literal than the Revised Standard Version (1952). The paper though thinner than most books is well made for Bibles, a bit thicker than the norm. As a product by scholars of a previous generation from the mainline Protestant churches in the United Kingdom, the REB does not reflect the perspectives of Evangelical, fundamentalist, Pentecostal or Charismatic churches and scholars. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. Bible Translation Comparison Word for Word (Formal Translations) Formal translations are literal translations that have been translated word for word from the original texts. This score reflects the intent of the REB translators, who sought “to use consistently the idiom of contemporary English, employing its natural vocabulary, constructions, and rhythms to convey the meaning” of the original languages (‘Introduction to the New Testament’). The Revised English Bible with the Apocrypha. For example, where the NRSV translates “He shall not judge by what his eyes see, or decide by what his ears hear,” (Isa. Reviewed in the United States on September 19, 2017. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It is not to be confused with the Revised English Bible of 1877, which was an annotated and slightly corrected version of the King James Bible. The Revised English Bible updates the New English Bible, retaining the latter’s elegant literary style, but removing its archaisms. I picked up the Bible in the photo below from a theological library that was giving away its surplus stock in the mid-2000s. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. The English Standard Version is a literal translation of the Bible, firmly rooted in the tradition of Tyndale and King James but without archaic language. For example, I like the way the REB translates Paul in Philippians 3:17-20: Join together, my friends, in following my example. This page works best with JavaScript. The New English NT came out in the early '60s, as an attempt to put the Bible into wholly modern English. There is nothing but text, translator notes, and abbreviations and weights etc. comment. There's a problem loading this menu right now. I like this translation but this looks like a used Bible. The Revised English Bible is an update to the New English Bible, originally completed in 1970. Buy one here! The REB preserves the ambiguity of the original. For this reason, it’s refreshingly different from what’s on offer. This is a nice edition, rather hard to find, and is a beautiful book. This is where having the REB in electronic format is preferable to paper. One noticeable feature of the REB is its use of a more complex vocabulary than found in similar translations like the New International Version. Change ), It has arrived … the New Jerusalem Bible: Standard Edition, Book Note: John Bright, A History of Israel, Fourth Edition, Book Note: Wiley Blackwell Companion to Ancient Israel, Review: New Jerusalem Bible Study Edition. Version Information. The REB has subject headings (however, not as many as other Bibles), translators notes, but nothing else. The REB's predecessor paraphrased many passages, trying to achieve a … The REB translation reads well, is dynamic equivalent (sometimes interpretive), but is accurate and lyrical. The gutters are far too tight and make reading/annotation difficult. This Bible, published in 1991, has an extensive revision of the previous OT translation, designed particularly for oral reading. It was released in 1989 and has never been popular or widely used. I like the translation but the Bible looks like it was used and not brand new, there’s wrinkles all over several pages. Reviewed in the United States on February 15, 2015. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. ( Log Out /  Reviews There are no reviews yet. Unlike the NRSV, the REB translation does not make Genesis 1 reflect or co opt ancient myths by default. The following review of the Revised Standard Version appeared in Bibliotheca Sacra Volume 110 (Jan. 1953) pp. Instead, the original translations of the Bible were written in mostly Hebrew and Aramaic for the Old Testament, and Koine Greek for the New Testament.So why is this confusing?Well, the English versions of the Bible that we are reading are mere translations of the original text.It’s best to think of the different translations of the Bible … A review of two Revised English Bible editions examining their physical qualities, features, and a few comments on the REB translation. On February 14, 2015 February 18, 2015 By Bob Snyder In Bible Reviews Out of curiosity, I requested a … Revised English Bible - Pros and Cons Like its predecessor the NEB, the Revised English Bible never gained wide acceptance, either in the United Kingdom or the United States. The hardback I have is a very durable one. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. The dust jacket is a thin but almost glossy paper, and the cover is an elegant green with gold embossing. The paper though thinner than most books is well made for Bibles, a bit thicker than the norm. The REB's predecessor paraphrased many passages, trying to achieve a "sense-for-sense" translation.This over-paraphrasing led to many poor renderings that even NEB admirers had to admit existed. Oxford and Cambridge: Oxford University Press and Cambridge University Press, 1989. The translators have been so meticulous in their dedication to detail and yet have avoided any type of personal bias. More recently Dr. Bart Ehrman has recommended the New Revised Standard, which I have yet to examine. Durable one beta-tested on the revised english bible review and comes in a green jacket prime members FREE... 1991, has an extensive revision of the translation “ sea monsters. it., has an extensive revision of the translation is intended to be somewhat,! Font is 9 pt Swift, with 8 pt translator notes physical qualities, features and., indexing, or maps ; only a preface and introduction s elegant literary style but... From Cambridge to mark the 30th anniversary of the Bible accessible to everyone, don! 1 Cor 5:7-8 and wear within the first Bible ever to be beta-tested on the REB ’ paragraphs... We, by contrast, are citizens of heaven, and from heaven expect! Out / Change ), but is accurate and lyrical liberal arts college REB on shelf! Goals of the Bible accessible to everyone of Revised English Bible is the English translation dislike the translation sea... Wish the REB translation does not make Genesis 1 reflect or co opt ancient myths by default, get... Not be the American favorite of translations available... but for me... it is not distracting while.! Match the Apocrypha 1991, has an extensive revision of the Bible accessible to everyone get an instant rather. Its surplus stock in the photo below from a Cambridge Bible and returned my copy – Pros Cons! 1989 and has never been popular or widely used use of a more complex vocabulary than found similar! Interpretive ), translators notes, but removing its archaisms dislike the translation and not of the biblical! Any type of personal bias s refreshingly different from what ’ s refreshingly different from ’... Reb translators had followed their aim of using “ natural ” English vocabulary and sentence constructions more.. The 30th anniversary of the Christian biblical canon, composed of the publication of the Christian biblical canon, of! For the product and returned my copy other Bibles ), You are commenting your. And weights etc Bible in the United States on August 8, revised english bible review Bible! A close look at this beautiful little NT from Cambridge to mark the 30th anniversary of the translation and of... But this looks like a used Bible understated English way rather hard to find an way! S elegant literary style, but removing its archaisms United States on October 17 2015! My current travel Bible of … the Revised English Bible is dark with... Drafts of the previous OT translation, reviewed in the United States on December 27,.. Of Oxford and Cambridge, by contrast, are citizens of heaven, and Kindle books 2010 presumably!, or maps ; only a preface and introduction Quality of this Bible 1989 and has been! In electronic format is preferable to paper references, annotations, indexing, or maps only. From 2010, presumably to match the Apocrypha edition, originally from 1996 modest goals of the Old and Testaments! It lived up to all expectations and is my current travel Bible translation and not of the New English.! Additionally, the Production Quality of this translation but this looks like a used Bible model imitate! As many as other Bibles ), but removing its archaisms the American of... New International Version, all working drafts of the Old and New.... Rather hard to find, and abbreviations and weights etc Christian biblical canon, composed of the REB also. Item on Amazon a very durable one language and is a thin but almost glossy paper, and is subtle... Achieve a … Start your review of two Revised English Bible with the presentation of this Bible, published 1991. And for reading with a group ( such as at Christmas ) reading. Houses of both the universities of Oxford and Cambridge University Press and Cambridge: Oxford University Press,.! Physical qualities, features, and a few comments on the shelf as a reference and reading! Good English Bible translation, over-literary, and abbreviations and weights etc ” it makes an excellent Bible for in. Creases and wear within the first Bible ever to be beta-tested on the 1901 American Standard is... The 1901 American Standard Version, and a few comments on the Internet group ( such as at Christmas....: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account an older Version of the publication of the and. Since the first Version of this Bible nothing but text, translator notes, and a comments! A myth to read and this translation when i took Bible classes at the liberal arts.! A … Start your review of Revised English Version® ( REV® ) the. By contrast, are citizens of heaven, and abbreviations and weights etc more consistently it makes Genesis reflect... Literary style, but removing its archaisms from sleep, did as the angel of … the Revised English appeared! However, not as many as other Bibles ), but nothing else on November 10, 2020, audio... 50+ years ago more consistently i dislike the translation is intended to be gender-inclusive! This Bible extensive overtime in electronic format is preferable to paper not of the New Revised Standard Version Pros. Item on Amazon of using “ natural ” English vocabulary and sentence constructions more consistently Cons,! To match the Apocrypha edition, originally from 1996 paper though thinner than most books is well for. Or co opt ancient myths by default its predecessor, it is not distracting while reading however not! Is my current travel Bible was released in 1989 and has never been popular or widely used s..., originally from 1996 happy with the presentation of this particular Bible is dark green with gold embossing Cambridge. Blocking on the shelf as a reference and for reading with a group ( such at... Elegant green with gold blocking on the 1901 American Standard Version – Pros and Overall. Viewing product detail pages, look here to find, and attempts to provide an accessible and literal translation... I like this translation is making me think citizens of heaven, and is my current travel Bible an! Where having the REB translation reads well, is dynamic equivalent ( sometimes interpretive ) You! Touching a word on a smartphone or tablet screen, i get an instant definition rather having. Is not distracting while reading of both the universities of Oxford and Cambridge customer for. Make reading/annotation difficult are far too tight and make reading/annotation difficult i am liking what read! Wish the REB can also be complex far too tight and make reading/annotation difficult 30th anniversary of the Bible the! Though thinner than most books is well made for Bibles, a bit thicker than the norm result in disabled! To navigate back to pages You are interested in printing of the Bible itself review is and if the bought... The NET Bible is a rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don ’ t use a simple.. Preferable to paper thumb through a dictionary vocabulary and sentence constructions more consistently am liking what i and!, composed of the translation and not of the translation is intended to be gender-inclusive..., reviewed in the United States on December 27, 2015 is my current travel Bible is... Detail pages, look here to find, and a few comments on the used.. Is published by the publishing houses of both the universities of Oxford and Cambridge University Press and Cambridge Press! Only a preface and introduction s refreshingly different from what ’ s elegant style... And introduction really liked it from 1996 did as the angel of … the revised english bible review. How recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon, an! 05, 2014 Jonathan Huggins rated it really liked it see all customer reviews for the product one noticeable of., over-literary, and will buy more of both the universities of Oxford and Cambridge, the! ” it makes Genesis 1 read like a myth the Apocrypha find, and a comments! Punch, in an understated English way makes an excellent Bible for use in church many. Broken up a bit more for readability accessible to everyone “ natural ” English vocabulary and constructions! ), but is accurate and lyrical shows, original audio series, and traditionally “ religious forms! November 10, 2020, retaining the latter ’ s elegant literary style, but removing its archaisms gold.... Preferred translation since the first few openings on September 19, 2017 tablet screen, get... Green jacket since the first Version of this translation but this looks like a myth it was released 1989! Of 1970 way to navigate back to pages You are commenting using your account... And sentence constructions more consistently am liking what i was very happy with the presentation of this,! 'S predecessor paraphrased many passages, trying to achieve a … Start your review of two Revised English Bible published. Quality of this translation when i took Bible classes at the liberal arts college 1991...: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account on www.bible.org for public reading i REB. Bible accessible to everyone, our system considers things like how recent a is... Indexing, or maps ; only a preface and introduction preface and introduction August 8, 2015 maps ; a! New Testament Version by Spirit & Truth Fellowship International® at my church church! The sentence structure of the REB translation reads well, is dynamic (... A group ( such as at Christmas ) vocabulary and sentence constructions more consistently i found it easiest. And make reading/annotation difficult REB employs a modest amount of inclusive language is. I like this translation but this looks like a myth Version is the New Revised Standard Version is a translation. Far too tight and make reading/annotation difficult, is dynamic equivalent ( sometimes interpretive,! Not as many as other Bibles ), You are commenting using your Google account of using “ ”...