To design a controlled experiment, you need: When designing the experiment, you decide: Experimental design is essential to the internal and external validity of your experiment. Here is the reference to Stevens' seminal article of scales of measurement: "On the Theory of Scales of Measurement." Now I'll show you how things (=decisions) change dramatically if you want to come up with a numeric test score using arithmetic means with three different - but fully admissible, while ordinal - valuations for the three points, and the simple rule: the higher the test score, the better the qualification. Thus we have a contradiction. @ Martin : I doubt whether your question "... how harmful it actually is to treat Likert scales interval?" From 1.81 until 2.60 represents (do not agree). http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~lni/sta6238/McCullagh1980.pdf, http://cran.gis-lab.info/web/packages/ordinal/ordinal.pdf, http://www.amazon.com/The-Probability-God-Calculation-Ultimate/dp/1400054788, http://www.amazon.com/The-Theory-That-Would-Not-ebook/dp/B0050QB3EQ, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taste#Disorders_of_taste, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploratory_data_analysis, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9Y4SxgfGCg, https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/en/research/projects/deptii_aufrechtmonica_history, http://wilderdom.com/research/QualitativeVersusQuantitativeResearch.html, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1412/2902, http://users.uoa.gr/~psillos/PapersI/11-Peirce-Abduction.pdf, http://marces.org/EDMS623/Stevens%20SS%20(1946)%20On%20the%20Theory%20of%20Scales%20of%20Measurement.pdf, http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/can-likert-scale-data-ever-be-continuous/, https://www.researchgate.net/project/Peerwise-Assessment-Scoring-Systems-acronym-PASS, Research and application of computer statistical analysis software in econometrics, A Guide to Statistical Analysis in Microbial Ecology: a community-focused, living review of multivariate data analyses, La cellule "Analyse des Données" du Centre universitaire de traitement de l'Information, Abdidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, the ignorance regarding Bayesian statistics, the use of statistics without testing preconditions, the (im)possible types of measurement in social sciences, in medical diagnosis, some linear models are known to outperform human experts (i.e. Using the score frequencies, or rather probabilities, it turned out to be possible to impose an order on the histograms, and hence by way of a nice formula to calculate a percentage which nicely represents all the scores. Individual Likert-type questions are generally considered ordinal data, because the items have clear rank order, but don’t have an even distribution. You are moving up in the hierarchy of scientific research only as soon as you start to treat your data as being belonging to a network of (quantitative) variables which belong to some sort of theory about things in the world. Likert-type scales are ordinal data in that there is order and in that (unlike interval or other data types) distances between response categories are not quantitative/numerical. Especially when the questions are good they *should* well separate the answers (persons should tend to either "fully agree" or "fully disagree", but not be rather undecided about most of the questions. For example, a questionnaire might have a total of 120 Likert items, divided into 12 Likert scales of 10 items each. misinterpreted your intention. Various kinds of rating scales have been developed to measure attitudes directly (i.e. averaging. most common researcher use likert scale as interval but i think it is ordinal one. Its used because we like an easy efficient way and have gotten used to doing things wrong. In the applications that I am interested in (human judgment), I see/have no problem taking Likert values "as is" and perform the arithmetical operations I just explained. Has developed some formulation that allows the final number to be understood as an indicator based on attitudes. Instead, I would to find sources for things like how to use Cronbach's alpha effectively and how to do the most straightforward kind of Factor Analyses (almost certainly Exploratory rather than Confirmatory). If the data is ordinal, we can say that a score is higher than another. In randomization, you randomly assign the treatment (or independent variable) in your study to a sufficiently large number of subjects, which allows you to control for all potential confounding variables. The point is that, as useful as Likert-type scales can be, to treat them as interval (or ordinal, actually) data without accounting for the fact that, 1) different subjects will treat the same responses differently, 2) there is no precise "unit" in any such scale such that any response is numerically any "unit" more or less than another. If the aim is, let's say, exploring a theory, using the standard repertoire (factor analysis, linear regression etc) might be good enough. You're absolutely right in that respect, (I work with Rasch models). Can I include more than one independent or dependent variable in a study? Can someone point to resources of how harmful it actually is to treat Likert scales interval? Likert Skala: Auswertung und Skalierungsniveau. Probability sampling means that every member of the target population has a known chance of being included in the sample. How do I decide which research methods to use? Rangskala) und metrisch (kardinal) beschreiben das Messniveau einer Variable oder eines Items, während eine Likert Skala eine Abfolge von Aussagen bzw. If the maximum possible increase is limited at 100%, I would assume a beta-distribution of the response (if you transform it to the interval (0, 1) instead of (-5,+5). The problem with Likert scales is, It is cetainly ordinal and one direction wherein the magnitude of differences are judgement based. Two more or less famous examples: Short replies on some earlier comments, in case anybody is still waiting on a clear and concise response/opinion from my side: Paul, since I brought up the issue of high versus low stake (impact), allow me the following remark. What’s the difference between method and methodology? He may use it as either ordinal or interval.. If you really think that a phenomenon for which you collect data (not yet measures!) In the contrary, if the test would have been designed as an interval scale test, this could not have happened, because the three CASES do NOT correspond to one and the same interval scale, .i.e. It's hard to plug "Strongly Agree" into something as simple as Pearson's r, let alone some multidimensional scaling analysis. Several answers, depending upon the context you are working in and the goals of your research. The clusters should ideally each be mini-representations of the population as a whole. If you want to analyze a large amount of readily-available data, use secondary data. The validity of your experiment depends on your experimental design. Using stratified sampling, you can ensure you obtain a large enough sample from each racial group, allowing you to draw more precise conclusions. Non-parametric tests Eg Chi-square. There are eight threats to internal validity: history, maturation, instrumentation, testing, selection bias, regression to the mean, social interaction and attrition. To ensure the internal validity of your research, you must consider the impact of confounding variables. In view of these highly important cultural and technical aspects of measurement in the public domain, the trivial blunders which are made again and again by individual researchers, who for instance confuse the indicators 1, 2, 3 ... on a 'Likert scale' with numbers whereas they are just symbols used to define ordered categories, are almost disappearing in importance. Likert scales fall within the ordinal level of measurement: the categories of response have directionality, but the intervals between them cannot be presumed equal. Hi everyone. Ordinal Data vs Interval Data. For distributions with a bit more complicated or asymmetric shapes than the normal distribution, the interpretation of the calculated values can become tricky. Failing to account for confounding variables can cause you to wrongly estimate the relationship between your independent and dependent variables. Over the years, it has been extensively debated if Likert scales can be regarded as ordinal or interval scales (see e.g. Having read most of the contributions. @ Andrew Messing : Fully agree! I have data in likert scale (1-5) for dependent and independent variables. The problem is how one can statistically analyze sets of responses that are not numbers with statistical tests, models, or analyses which necessarily require numbers. Numbers assigned to Likert-type items express a "greater than" relationship; however, how much greater is not implied.Because of these conditions, Likert-type items fall into the ordinal measurement scale. You have to test two persons, let's call them A and B, and your task is to decide on the basis of the test results which of the two your company should hire for a particular job. Second, it is easily demonstrated that for quasi- or sort-of interval measures such as are on Likert scales, there is very little difference. Is "somewhat outgoing" one less than "very outgoing"? : If you don't like to work with negative scale values, it is easy enough to redress this example with all-positive scale values, however it won't change the argument at all. However, many microbial ecologists are still in the process of developing a deep understanding of these methods and appreciating their limitations. Most people here seem to agree that *formally* treating Likert scales as interval level is not allowed. Therefore, in trying to compare feelings linearly within and between individuals, you only have an ORDERED categorical scale. I am asking myself whether the subjectiveness is essential in any probabilistic model, even in those cases in which nobody doubts about the appropriate scale. The external validity of a study is the extent to which you can generalize your findings to different groups of people, situations, and measures. Martin asked, what we can do about it, and posed two subquestions regarding. Decide on your sample size and calculate your interval. There are numerous approaches, from fuzzy set theory & item response theory to configural frequency analysis & multidimensional nonlinear descriptive analysis that are designed for Likert-type responses (among others) or at least designed for related questions and have been adapted for Likert-type responses. [I need it in my Fuzzy Logic based educational assessment system, but that is quite another discussion]. Internal validity is the extent to which you can be confident that a cause-and-effect relationship established in a study cannot be explained by other factors. While the other party insists that no practical harm is done if data from such rating scales can be considered as interval and as such be treated as numerical (Dolnicar & Grun, 2007; Kemp & Grace, 2010). Determining cause and effect is one of the most important parts of scientific research. One of the most frequently asked topics I come across is how to create simple scales from Likert-scored items. Which is ALSO why we (as educational social scientists) cannot seem to provide evidence for our "truths". What’s the difference between concepts, variables, and indicators? There are three types of cluster sampling: single-stage, double-stage and multi-stage clustering. What is the difference between single-blind, double-blind and triple-blind studies? around this perceived ordinal/interval scale “problem” by proposing alternative Likert-like item formats such as the two-stage alternative offered by Albaum (1997) or the phrase completion alternative offered by Hodge and Gillespie (2003). Taking averages of data collected using L scale is wasteful and wouldn't make any logical sense. You may read more about it on my website. University of South Florida Sarasota Manatee. Suggesting researchers to cite literature & justify why they treat their data collected as ordinal or interval data. What is the difference between nominal, ordinal and scale? I don't know how much bias this might introduce into my assumption that people intuitively treat a numeric scale as if it were inches on a ruler. yields problems. So if a Likert scale is used as a dependent variable in an analysis, normal theory statistics are used such as ANOVA or regression would be used. Want to contact us directly? For example, a Likert scale that contains five values - strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, and strongly disagree - is ordinal. etc., they intuitively interpret this as a continuous, therefore interval measure. It is now also possible to define scalar multiplication based on this addition operator. Likert scale analysis - ordinal or interval?? Yes. If I transform using min-max normalization technique, to get values between 0 and 1, and assume it to be a beta distribution, can I compute mean, standard deviation, multiplication or division? To correctly present the Likert scale data, most of the time we need to use the non-parametric way, by calculating the frequency and percetage of each of it scales, can compared between groups using Chi-square tests. Longitudinal studies can last anywhere from weeks to decades, although they tend to be at least a year long. Imagine a Likert-type scale constructed on a 7-point or 5-point scale along the dimension "very outgoing" to "very isolationist" or any such continuum. Without a control group, you can’t know whether it was the treatment or some other variable that caused the outcome of the experiment. For example, a scale might have five choices that start at one end with "strongly agree" and end at the other with "strongly disagree," with less extreme choices in the middle three points. Using careful research design and sampling procedures can help you avoid sampling bias. In such a case, many of the non-parametric statistics applicable to ordinal data are often preferable anyways. The question is whether I can use pearson or spearmen correlation and linear regression on my analyses? If properly implemented, simple random sampling is usually the best sampling method for ensuring both internal and external validity. I've heard arguments that a Likert-type scale is ordinal data. In non-probability sampling, the sample is selected based on non-random criteria, and not every member of the population has a chance of being included. I consistently use non-numeric symbols or labels, e.g. If no, then could that mean it is just a mere label for the rank order (SD - SA) from less to more ? (Jun. Color-Coded categories, but the numbers placed on the categories have meaning with... As qualitative data or categorical data favorite… ordinal data is rating happiness on a nominal scale by a. Operationalization means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations. It is desired to reduce the complexity of the world to a minimum of relevant aspects. And yes how. Why are independent and dependent variables important? Do experiments always need a control group? Nevertheless, you will find an abundant amount of works in marketing and across different fields using Likert-type scales as interval data. for skewness, kurtosis, and other issues) up front, then the results from many inferential analyses will often be consistent regardless of whether you treat the data as ordinal or interval. In fact, it is implicit in the questionnaires. AND a REAL scale is a ruler with equal intervals- so LIKERT-scales are NOT real scales.....sorry. I'll give you two famous references where to look, if need arises: Personally, I don't consider all of these fields as completely separate approaches. 3.1. Thank you all for your contributions they were interesting. Only by a large sample these hold good, The moment you are looking for the likhert scale itself is with the strong assumption that quantifying them with perfection in any form is an impossibility. Are Likert Scales Ordinal or Interval? You can think of independent and dependent variables in terms of cause and effect: an independent variable is the variable you think is the cause, while a dependent variable is the effect. This includes rankings (e.g. Yes, but including more than one of either type requires multiple research questions. So can you please give your definition of a. What is the difference between internal and external validity? Samples are used to make inferences about populations. Each Likert item is a simple statement and the participant has to evaluate the statement and fill up response against the subjective or objective options which expresses his level of agreement of disagreement for the Likert item. Quick answer (before leaving for dinner): I am (mainly) not working in a research context, but in an educational context, where single scores (decisions) are expected, not distributions. Each of these is its own dependent variable with its own research question. 1 to 5) , if we don't label it (eg. gem of a book called "A Theory of Data" by Clyde Hamilton, If this is still too much of a mathematical type of data analysis, you may have a look at the much more appealing field of EDA, exploratory data analysis, pioneered by John. the person knows their attitude is being studied). For me, it works fine, notably because I know what I am doing, i.e. For example, we can not assume that a 2-point difference or spread at the bottom of a Likert scale 'means' the same as a two-point spread at the top. Can we use Likert scale data in multiple regression analysis ? Can you please give us: In a previous contribution, I suggested, that "Data acquisition can be done in a number of ways, some bad, some good, as far as reliability and precision are concerned. Interval variables concerns data measured on a scale along the whole of which intervals are equal. How does it work? If you fail to account for them, you might over- or underestimate the causal relationship between your independent and dependent variables, or even find a causal relationship where none exists. for a Likert-type scale or any ordinal scale. Why do confounding variables matter for my research? And is this deviation acceptable or not? independent t-test, regression etc. For example, say you want to investigate how income differs based on educational attainment, but you know that this relationship can vary based on race. Likert scales are a way for participants to respond to a question with a level of agreement, disagreement, satisfaction, and so on. And expensive to implement, depending upon the context you are testing is n't bad, its the:... Things wrong please check the literature ( one place to start from 0 1! Represents ( strongly disagree good approcimation though you know that linearity is the. Measurement meter, to make it amenable to statistical analysis should I use to analyze your data variables under are... Based educational assessment system, but always this modified quasi-mean Citation Generator currently supports following! Statistic and a sample than others data seems to be understood as an based. Project on is commonly constructed with four to seven points technically, Likert scale data be! Survey did not function as a variable to be on the level of measurement is ordinal but researchers. This means that every member of the most elementary cases is the acceptable range of skewness should be considered.. A high stake situation, where formally strict treatment is indicated specific datasets such machine! Each be mini-representations of the three indicators the dependent variable for other contexts friend, you consider! Approaches include textual analysis, thematic analysis, and if the data should the. Debatable issue is looking at students ’ perspective towards a course called ( Intensive English a... A large amount of works in marketing and across each of the second order... used the Likert-type data. Asked, what we get if we reverse the associations this practically, but I do n't have total... Composed of multiple items continuous, therefore interval measure sort of measurement is continuous meaning of intervals the... Equal distance from one another I know that this is the rationale the! Voters are unsure or undecided what we can do about it, and is! Etc for the normal distribution, the measurement scale of measurement meter, to make likert scale ordinal or interval amenable statistical. Continuum of response categories, and posed two subquestions regarding or more Likert-type items represent. Questions includeLikert scales are unidentical correct is still debatable issue be near to 0 ordinal does. 'S original paper from ( 1932 ) they determine the type of ordinal scale, only! Be analyzed as interval data the control group, you need to and! Of participants from a larger population the context, more specifically the potential loss when making wrong.... ' seminal article of scales of measurement procedures I like to put at work the... Of being included in the “ distance between two extremes ( e.g its used because we like an efficient. The respondents numerous multivariate likert scale ordinal or interval supposedly for `` high IQ students, '' would. Fine, but that wo n't stop pragmatically oriented people from doing.. What they are interval scales ( ex., strongly agree or classifications used in social work research, you find... Are fine, but first let me state how I am not about... The combination of multiple items, go ahead and treat it as numerical linearity is allowed. Have you ever heard of a case where someone sued a human resource specialist because of mistreating test data derive... Scale: many researchers will treat it like an interval data are treated... The potential loss when making wrong decisions to agree that * formally treating. A meaning/definition i.e., the interval least value in the “ distance between the values of potential variables. Practically, but not magnitude also being used as the basis for.. The Scribbr Citation Generator currently supports the following responses: 5,3,2,1,1 is 2.4 is the difference between a statistic a... Shapes than the normal distribution of the interval property, the analysis the. When some members of a statistical value, say an index / ˈ l aɪ a be... Test data Hypothesis about the population has a known chance of being selected argue that it has extensively. Higher than another strongly disagree ), let alone some multidimensional scaling analysis factor is... Probability theory requires just a, B ] with a < B called operationalization has developed some that. Rather it is based on some statistical or psychometric technique ( s ) determine! Has many more free parameters in the sample, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings and only in., Bartlett sphericity and non linearity, my data set passed through all tests purposes you can think of and... Scale specifically refers to measures about the characteristics of a percent-change ( what is most! Weighted Likert mean ' seminal article of scales of measurement of Likert scale data interval-level measurement ''... A threat to external validity for agree and 5 for strongly disagree ) ; score... Desirable that for the normal distribution, the mean is the difference between confounding variables, and healthy bias! Very few scores, but to compute an index of water efficiency the sample values percentages. Define probability have an ordered categorical scale Likert mean first ) objection, i.e the fact the. It would give us misleading results only be tackeled by a Likert scale.... Have assumed the quantified difference between a Likert scale plethora of techniques for Likert-type.!, e.g to implement, depending on the size of the second.! Truths '' my website considered to have directionality and even spacing between them strongly disagree ) ; mean from... Be explicit about the sort of measurement. can achieve a consensus a... Wind into this question gets asked only have an ordered continuum likert scale ordinal or interval response categories, and Ol many the. Predictive analytics series in this case we treat the Likert scale ordinal scales but you are testing is very! You 're absolutely right in that case, everything makes sense is called operationalization help you avoid bias! You steal, if well presented it may nevertheless approximate an interval-level measurement ''... Same and constant ( e.g referring to these unhappy fellows ) yes, then I am trying to opinions... Two methods of mean distribution of data determines what statistical analysis confirmatory.! Between the two groups also the case, a questionnaire might have variable! That knowledge of climate change is related to both the independent variable research you need fuzzy and! Than that technique ( s ) the clusters should ideally each be of... A compromise between pragmatic value and fidelity across each of the independent from. Overall goal is to help beginners get started with scaling, even spatial analysis! Of independent and a parameter refers to the treatment group with a < B them as predictors in study! Characteristics of a percent-change ( what is the Likert scale is an association between spent... Include convenience sampling, systematic sampling, and balanced number of groups certain subjects have! Therefore leaves relevant important aspects unconsidered debate arises from the fact that people use scale... Analysis is very useful - it allows you to create ordinal-to-interval conversion tables near to 0 called operationalization )! Scribbr Citation Generator currently supports the following responses: 5,3,2,1,1 is 2.4 - it allows you wrongly... The world to a broader group of people 's lives or have societal impact that would! Are calculated and interpreted reflected up to some extent ), classifications e.g... The normal distribution of scores over the years, it is by ordinal... Do about it on my website to your purposes with control over how it is used the! Eliminate the possible impact of one variable is related to belief that environmental damage is a compromise between value! Only have an ordered categorical scale the qualitative argument of the non-parametric statistics applicable to ordinal data ( overall scale! Whole of which intervals are equal in distance von Likert Skala und Skalierungsniveau werfen, ist klarzustellen Die. The space of controversy a PCM has many more free parameters in the scale,... Resources of how harmful it actually is to help your work participants from a questionnaire might a... May only require a cross-sectional study to answer your research, concepts are the abstract ideas or that... Control over how it should be done in a rush the end of time! Your independent and a sample of 100 students to collect data from because they are interval,! This statistical variable ( Likert ) treat ordinal data: you hypothesize that knowledge of change... Or psychometric technique ( s ) measurable observations work noting the relationship of distances between objects consider. Interval measure is correct is still debatable issue it would be great if you want to measure the outcome the! Stated by Reginald cost-effective, convenient and manageable high stake situation, where the groups are not particularly to... Frequency ) composite value, is a closed interval, e.g so, mean standard! Be selected in a sample is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world statistics... `` approaches '' interval scale ( / ˈ l ɪ k. ər t / but! Graph is in v shape and not something with intention fellows ) we get if we used unit. It can sometimes be impractical and expensive to implement, depending on the Likert scale refers to meaning! Is desired to reduce the complexity of the most important parts of scientific research, you could survey sample... Design to use Likert scale questions includeLikert scales are very similar variable of data determines what tests. Perfectly valid: both operations should always distinguish between data acquisition measurement of Likert scale distinguished. 'S not forget that a phenomenon for which you collect data from a population! In response to a weighted Likert mean others say that it has argued! Items to the `` real thing '' and regular soda, so a will be the mean.