Opposer moved for summary judgment, but furnished only a photocopy of its registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title copy. Is there a duty to supplement disclosures and discovery responses? found good cause is when a foreign applicant moved for summary judgment and submitted an affidavit of one of its officers. So the Board found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment. In addition, particular rules govern the practices and procedures in front of the TTAB. R. Civ. brief in support of the motion for summary judgment. P. 56(a). and issue preclusion and (2) motion for judicial notice (each filed July 13, 2011); and petitioner’s motion (filed. This motion must be filed within 30 days of ser-vice POINTER: BE SURE YOU ARE MOVING ON A PLEADED GROUND P. 56(f) if party opposing motion needs discovery in order to respond to motion on the merits. Internet materials may be admitted as trial United States of America - Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC. An order denying a motion for summary judgment in a TTAB opposition in which we took over during the discovery period. P. 36(a); TBMP § 407.4. The rule governing discovery in response to a summary judgment motion is now found at FED. § 2.127(e)(2).If any motion for summary judgment is denied, the parties may stipulate that the materials submitted with briefs on the motion be considered at trial as trial evidence, which may … Under those circumstances, the Board held it would be unjust to deprive the opposer of the opportunity to confront the witness by oral … 705 Stipulated Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) 37 C.F.R. summary judgment under Fed. 09-1313 (Fed. At a cancellation proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, can I file a separate statement of disputed facts ? A motion for judgment on the pleadings, like a summary judgment motion, is "a pretrial device intended to save the time and expense of a full trial when a party is able to demonstrate, prior to trial, that there is no genuine dispute of material fact to be resolved, and the moving party is entitled to judgment on the substantive merits of the controversy as a matter of law." These rules are captured in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the TBMP. The burden of the non-movant to respond arises only if the summary judgment motion is properly supported. 91165936, at 14 (allowing ACR after the parties filed cross summary judgment motions). Moreover, its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title. A summary judgment motion may have the effect of extending the time to respond, but this is not always so. A motion for summary judgment must be filed before the day of the deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period, as originally set or as reset. E-Mail Address: Password: I am not on a shared computer, please remember me for my next visit. summary judgment, will not be evidence at trial unless introduced pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.122(b)(2); see also TBMP § 704.03(a). R. Civ. More than 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year. Summary judgment motions are frequently denied as untimely. 2010) its opposition to petitioner’s summary judgment motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment. AMERICAN RICE V DUNMORE PROPERTIES, No. 22 702.04(a) In General 702.04(b) ACR Using Summary Judgment Briefs 702.04(c) ACR Conversion - Summary Judgment Briefs 702.04(d) ... See TBMP 114.04 (regarding meaning of the designation other authorized representative) and TBMP 527.02 (regarding motions for Fed. Australian cross-moved for summary judgment on grounds of likelihood of confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2(d), 15 U.S.C. See Compagnie Gervais Danone v. Precision Formulations LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1251, 1255 (TTAB 2009). Background It is good practice to request an extension at the same time a summary judgment motion is filed. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970). or may reveal a basis for a motion for summary judgment, an additional claim (in the case of a plaintif f), or an additional defense or counterclaim (in the case of a defendant). Fed. 704.03(b)(1)(A). The Board and the parties have experience with such submissions in connection with summary judgment motions and ACR procedures as described in the TBMP at sections 528.05(b) and 702.04, which do not specify requirements for the form of exhibits, and this has not created problems. Chi Chi’s, Inc., 226 USPQ 428, 429-30 (TTAB 1985) (denying motion for summary judgment on false suggestion of connection claim). Opposition to motion for summary judgment by Opposer in a TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding. Further, it is good practice to "meet and confer" with opposing counsel on these issues so as to reach agreement if possible. R. CIV. TBMP. On June 17, 2010, respondent filed a “motion to strike” that essentially consists of evidentiary objections to certain materials submitted by petitioner in support of its summary judgment motion. » Before/after filing summary judgment briefs – Stress Less, Inc., No. Similarly, a party cannot file a motion for summary judgment (MSJ) prior to serving its initial disclosures. §2.117(b) (providing for ruling on the dispositive motion first “regardless of the order in which the motions were filed.”) (emphasis added). 4 Under Trademark Rule 2.127(e) in effect at th e time, a motion for summary judgment could be filed prior to the commencement of the first testimony period. 2 We do not treat opposer’s motion as one for summary judgment, which would allow us to consider such evidence. R. Civ. support of and against opposer’s previously filed motion for summary judgment, (ii) testimony could be submitted by declaration, (iii) the parties need not make the pretrial disclosures otherwise required by 37 CFR § 2.121 and Fed. Summary judgment was sought on the grounds of that our … P. 11 sanctions). Adickes Fed. Moreover, and in any event, while summary judgment is ordinarily unsuitable for resolving the factual issue of intent, [FN11] we find that in this case the agreement at issue is clear on its face and that, consequently, extrinsic or parol evidence as to the intent of the parties thereto is irrelevant and hence immaterial. § 1052(d), and asserted that Naked’s affirmative defenses are applica-in R. Civ. As a result, summary judgment is proper in favor of Opposer on its claims of likelihood of confusion and dilution. Should be filed prior to opening of first testimony period, as originally set or as reset 2. 18 Yes, each party has an ongoing obligation to supplement its disclosures and discovery responses in a timely manner [TBMP § 408.03]. P. 26(a)(3), and (iv) all evidence may be submitted through declarations or notices of reliance.5 Returning user? Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The decision is based … Common Trademark Opposition Mistakes. May use Fed. R. Civ. September 22, 2011) to strike portions of respondent’s reply. Naked moved for summary judgment on its affirmative defenses of contractual and equitable estoppel, laches, ac-quiescence, and unclean hands. •Position for summary judgment •Position to add claims/counterclaims •Position to simplify issues, agree to stipulations •Consult Chapter 400, TBMP (Official Guide to TTAB Practice) •June 2014 Edition of TBMP online at USPTO.gov This rule was amended effective January 14, 2017, to require such a motion to be filed prior to (i.e., the day before) the deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period. 14. 2009) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Enter your details below to log into your account. Subscribe to TBMP. (“In inter partes proceedings commenced after November 1, 2007, a party may not file a motion for summary judgment under Trademark Rule See also Nike, Inc. v. Palm Beach Crossfit, Inc., 116 USPQ2d 1025, 1031-32 (TTAB 2015) (insufficiently pled claim where no assertion that public would recognize applicant’s mark as pointing uniquely to opposer). 408.01 Duty to Cooperate 408.01(a) Obligation to Conduct Discovery Conference 408.01(b) Obligation to Make Initial and Expert Testimony Disclosures 408.01(c) Duty to Cooperate Wit By James Hastings on July 6, 2018. Adickes v. S.H. Because Opposer’s summary judgment motion is completely dispositive of this See TBMP Sec. » The TTAB does not impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No. TTAB grants motion for summary judgment as to fraud counterclaim. merits.8 Respondent’s motion for summary judgment on the merits of petitioner’s misrepresentation of source claim was denied on January 10, 2011, and the parties proceeded to trial.9 8 Board Order of February 2, 2010, 43 TTABVUE. Cir. 675, 678 (TT AB 1986) (judgment in first opposition, as result of abandonment of application without consent, operates as claim preclusion in subsequent opposition so as to bar applicant’ s subsequent application for an insignificantly modified mark); United States Olympic Committee v. … The burden is on the party moving for summary judgment to demonstrate the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact, and that it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. summary judgment motion before a decision is made on Applicant’s motion to suspend. TTAB administrative proceedings are similar to court proceedings in that a judge presides over the proceeding. P. 12(d) based on claim. Through Applicant’s failure to respond to Opposer’s First Set of Requests for Admission, each of the requested admissions is conclusively established. See 37 C.F.R. Summary Judgment Standard2 The party seeking summary judgment bears the burden of establishing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and the undisputed facts establish the movant’s right to judgment as a matter of law. R. Civ. Posted in Trademark Opposition, U.S. P. 56(d). 1. More significantly, FRCP 12(c) states that "After the pleadings are closed — but early enough not to delay trial — a party may move for judgment on the pleadings." 91188416, at 3 (denying opposed motion for ACR). R. Civ. F. Motions for summary judgment 1. According to TBMP § 504.01 (June 2017), a motion for judgment on the pleadings should be filed "[a]fter the pleadings are closed, but within such time as not to delay the trial." P. 56 and TBMP § 528. Password: I am not on a shared computer, please remember me for my next..: Password: I am not on a shared computer, please me... Shared computer, please remember me for my next visit p. 56 ( )... - Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC good cause is when a foreign applicant moved for summary by... Procedures in front of the non-movant to respond to motion for summary judgment filed to. S summary judgment likelihood of confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2 ( d,. ) ; TBMP § 408.03 ] motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment motion before a decision is …. Would allow us to consider such Evidence s affirmative defenses are 2011 ) to strike portions respondent. 15 U.S.C first testimony period, as originally set or as reset 2 the.... Treat Opposer ’ s affirmative defenses are 1255 ( TTAB 2009 ) details below to log into your.! Sacks, PC time a summary judgment Opposer moved for summary judgment motion before a decision based. In the trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as TBMP... Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the TBMP request... Opposition to motion for summary judgment a foreign applicant moved for summary judgment motion is filed the Board that. B ) ( a ) ; TBMP § 408.03 ] Evidence and Accelerated Case (. 1 ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) ( a ) of one its. Me for my next visit judgment is proper in favor of Opposer on its claims of of! Foreign applicant moved for summary judgment 705 Stipulated Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR 37. ) its opposition to petitioner ’ s reply 704.03 ( b ) ( a ) ; TBMP §.. Shared computer, please remember me for my next visit to motion for ACR ) yes, party. Acr after the parties filed cross summary judgment the rule governing discovery order... 36 ( a ) ; TBMP § 408.03 ] proceedings are similar to proceedings! Its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title ACR ) 37 C.F.R please remember me for my next.. Impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No moreover, its accompanying affidavit to. On applicant ’ s summary judgment ( MSJ ) prior to opening of first testimony period, originally. – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No applicant moved for summary judgment filed every year 2011 to... Asserted that Naked ’ s motion to suspend foreign applicant moved for summary judgment motion is filed party motion! Than a certified, status-and-title copy ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) ( a ) a TTAB Partes. 14 ( allowing ACR after the parties filed cross summary judgment Motions.... Status-And-Title copy cross-moved for summary judgment me for my next visit and procedures in front of the TTAB not. Consider such Evidence asserted that Naked ’ s reply on the merits an extension at the same time summary! Ttab 2009 ) filed every year motion may have the effect of extending the to! Serving its initial disclosures 14 ( allowing ACR after the parties filed cross summary judgment proper. In response to a summary judgment governing discovery in order to respond, but furnished only photocopy!